Most of the value is created before anyone digs.
Four stages, in order. The first one is where a scheme is made or lost, and it is the one most often compressed.
How a development runs
The stages are not unusual. The discipline is in refusing to compress the first one.
- Stage one
- Feasibility and appraisal
- Stage two
- Planning and consents
- Stage three
- Procurement and delivery
- Stage four
- Handover and defects
One — Feasibility
The question is not what could be built here, it is what can be built here, operated profitably, and consented. Those three rarely give the same answer, and the overlap between them is the scheme.
We look at access and servicing, floor-to-floor heights, the structural capacity for the loadings the use imposes, where plant can physically go, the discharge route for kitchen extract if there is one, the planning history, and the licensing prospects. Then the appraisal is built up from the operator's actual requirements rather than down from a hoped-for figure.
Sometimes the honest answer is that the site does not work. Delivering that answer in week three is a considerably better outcome for a client than discovering it in month fourteen, and we would rather be the ones to say it.
Two — Consent
Leisure uses attract more consents than most. Beyond planning there is licensing, environmental health, highways and servicing, sometimes listed building or conservation area consent, and frequently a community that has a view worth engaging with before it becomes an objection.
We run these as one strategy rather than a sequence of separate applications that each discover the previous one's assumptions. Where pre-application engagement is available it is almost always worth taking.
Three — Delivery
The procurement route follows the risk, not habit. A scheme with a well-defined operator specification and a settled design suits a different contract from a refurbishment where the building is still capable of surprising everyone.
We select the contract and the contractor accordingly, then run the development through construction — the valuations, the instructions, the change control, and the discipline of holding a design that has already been co-ordinated rather than reopening it under programme pressure.
Four — Handover
The stage most often treated as an afterthought, and the one an operator feels most directly.
Commissioning is witnessed properly rather than signed off on a certificate. The operator's team is walked through the building and the systems they will actually have to run. The O&M information is checked for whether it is usable. And the defects period is managed to its end, not left to quietly expire.
What stays constant
One development manager
The same person from feasibility to the end of the defects period. Handovers between stages are where the reasoning behind a decision gets lost.
Surveys before assumptions
Particularly on refurbishment. What a survey costs is trivial against what an unexpected finding costs on a live programme.
Early bad news
A problem raised at the point it is identified is a decision. The same problem raised three months later is a claim.
The building in use
Every decision is tested against how the asset will be run on a wet Tuesday in February, not how it photographs on completion.